As far as the case is concerned, apart from focusing on the shooting itself, we should also pay attention to “the other sideâ€â€”whether there is any interception in the local area, regardless of the actual difficulties of the petitioners, and the obstruction of their expressions of appeal.
On May 2nd, policemen on duty at the Qing’an Railway Station in Heilongjiang shot and shot Xuan Hsiang, a local of Qing An, causing public concern. According to the Southern Metropolis Daily, local police said that things happened because Xu intercepted passengers at the security checkpoint in the waiting room to enter the station. Xu Chunhe’s family members revealed that on the same day, Xu drank alcohol and led his mother and three children to go to Dalian Jinzhou. The security personnel recognized the mother and son who had repeatedly appealed to them and feared that they would not allow them to get on the bus because they were worried about their petitions.
Xu Chunghe collided with the police in public places and robbed the police. The police also stated that he once had words such as "Whoever grabs the gun". If this is confirmed, the police will dispose of it quickly. It is not a bad idea to maintain the public. Safe emergency response. If we only categorized the behavior of Xu Hsonghe as a train station and even a police officer, it would be simple and straightforward. The problem is that throughout the whole process of disputes and fighting, it seems difficult to form a reasonable logical chain.
Why did Xu Xuanhe suddenly intercept other passengers at the security checkpoint? If it was going to harass, why didn't any acts of assaulting passengers occur?...... And the details of their family members' disclosures seem to make their logic more self-contained: "Because station security personnel "intercepted" earlier, the two sides are in conflict. According to this statement, the "interviewing visits" of the security inspectors involved in the incident has become an introduction to the incident: it has led to Xu's emotional out of control and intensified contradictions.
Although this is only the unilateral argument of Xu Chunghe's family, the official response has evaded Xu's previous plot. However, this is not a negligible matter, and the truth is worth asking. Now the local prosecutors have stepped in, hoping to fully restore the site at the time through measures such as full monitoring and disclosure. If the "spoofing" plot was confirmed, the new security forces of the "station security inspectors" were added to all kinds of interception teams. It also showed that the inertia of the citizen's petitions at the level of petitions has not yet disappeared.
It should be recognized that the public petitions are the rights granted by the law and no government or individual has the right to block them. In November 2013, Li Wei, deputy director of the State Bureau of Letters and Calls, pointed out that the citizens’ right to express their opinions, opinions, and suggestions is protected according to law. The State Bureau of Letters and Calls has issued a series of orders and orders, and it is expressly forbidden to restrict the normal petitions of the people in any form. In the case of the cancellation of the petitions and the emphasis on local dissolution, it is illegal to organize “hands-on visitsâ€.
Looking at the appeal of Xu Chunhe’s petition, he asked the government to help accept the mother and three children and consider the specific situation: I have no working ability and the wife has a mental disability, which is also in line with the state’s relevant relief policies. With regard to petitions and visits, the Central Government has explicitly requested that the masses petition for a reasonable solution to the problems, irrational ideological education is in place, assistance for the help of life is in place, and illegal acts are handled according to law. Now after the shooting incident, the local government immediately gave his family “help†to meet his petition appeals, which objectively confirmed the plausibility of the petition content. The question has arisen: Why can’t the local government properly solve it early and where is the main responsibility?
It was also because of the “rescue†that came late, and it was the hurry to solve the resettlement of the family members after Xu Chunghe’s death. This was also questioned as a stabilization measure under the crisis effect, rather than an active behavior of responsibility.
Therefore, as far as the case is concerned, in addition to focusing on the shooting itself, we should also pay attention to “the other sideâ€â€”whether there is any interception in the local area or whether it ignores the actual difficulties of the visiting households and blocks the expression of their appeals. Although this fact judgment does not hinder the handling of actions that endanger public safety, it is also a mirror of local governance capabilities. If problems are identified, they should be based on disciplinary procedures for petition work, and implement the accountability mechanism of “who creates the problem, who is responsible, and who is being investigatedâ€. Only in this way can the local government and officials be forced to abandon the ill-conditioned, backward-looking and stability-minded thinking and rule for good.
Stainless Steel Soft Annealed Wire
Stainless Steel Soft Annealed Wire,Soft Coil Stainless Steel Wire,Annealing Stainless Steel Wire,Stainless Steel Flexible
Jiangsu Manrui New Materials Co., Ltd , https://www.manruiweldingwire.com